No because as stated before they are only disproportionately responsible for mass shootings and political violence which justifies bans in places with lots of people and politically connected events, black males aged 15-24 should be banned completely because of their disproportionate murder rate overall which justifies it in any scenario.
Well I’m pretty sure you’re not allowed to bring guns into most k-12 schools in the first place, many colleges, and other packed places like stadiums and skyscrapers, so a rule or law preventing it is kinda benign. It’s like saying that 9/11 could’ve been prevented if there was a law preventing hijackings
That’s not the point. The point is that banning them from certain places does nothing. After 9/11, airport security was way higher and cockpits weren’t left unlocked. The action taken after that day made it much more difficult to repeat it. With guns, we’ve done almost nothing since Columbine to prevent mass shootings. Banning weapons with ability to inflict mass casualties and limiting magazine capacity is the way to go
I agree, people should never go to schools and shoot them up in the first place, but they do, so the question should be "how do we ensure that doesn't happen?", not "how do we ensure that doesn't happen while also adding in making kids think school isn't like prison?". Idk about you but I heard that phrase plenty in K-12 before school shootings were as frequent as today