Anonymous #2 7w

Most women would rather get with a 7/10 Trump supporting guy than a 5/10 liberal guy. To say otherwise is just social desirability bias.

-6

Anonymous #2 7w

insanely untrue bro i know the most chopped guys w baddies

7

Anonymous #3 7w

Anecdotal evidence

-5

Anonymous #2 7w

Insanely untrue I and my friends have turned down 9/10’s for being trump supporters or not voting. Believe me, politics DOES matter, maybe for some more than others but you’ll find your baddie

8

Anonymous #2 7w

believe it or not but you’re just not right lol. what’s your evidence that “most” women didn’t get the chance to to know you or your values before deciding they weren’t interested?

5

Anonymous #3 7w

Because a significant amount of the time they’ll either stop responding, unadd me, or block me after they see what I look like. That’s a sizeable minority but much of the rest of the time, they’ll just stop responding as much or do the one word response thing. That plus I have stuff on my dating profiles about how I’m liberal/left leaning and I don’t get any matches. They judge me before they even know me.

-1

Anonymous #2 7w

anecdotal evidence

3

Anonymous OP 7w

That doesn’t preclude you from turning down ugly men at the same rate even though they voted for Harris and did all the other things.

-2

Anonymous #2 7w

Okay but also dating apps suck and nobody gets anything off of there, if you want a real leftist baddie, start going to parties, hang out with your college’s SQE/SJP/other political chapters, the internet SUCKS for finding dates

4

Anonymous #3 7w

The stats also show that women rate more attractive men as average on dating apps so they have a higher standard of what is or isn’t attractive since they generally are the ones who get to choose who they go out with rather than having to pursue others

0

Anonymous OP 7w

He also has no proof that, that’s why people stopped responding lol. Or that the way he talks is normal and that’s not a factor as to why they stopped or whatever. Anecdotal evidence

0

Anonymous OP 7w

I do go to parties and to bars and to clubs and none of it matters because I can read body language and they’re disgusted by me. I’m a psychology student, I can recognise the signs

0

Anonymous #2 7w

I’m going off what you claimed in your OG comment. Most women, is anecdotal.

0

Anonymous #2 7w

It’s your personality. You’re off putting to speak to.

0

Anonymous #3 7w

You literally don’t even know me outside of this comment section and you’re proving my point of prejudging people before you even know them

1

Anonymous #2 7w

I don’t know what to tell you then, I can’t help you, and if you don’t believe me about how women think then I don’t have anything else to tell you 🤷‍♀️

1

Anonymous #2 7w

It’s your personality. I’m saying I don’t have to see your face to know that the way you speak would make women turn away. If anything I’m proving you wrong because I don’t know if you’re actually ugly or not.

0

Anonymous #2 7w

I’m not “pre” judging you. You said stuff that warranted a reaction bright eyes. My judging is based off you speaking.

0

Anonymous #3 7w

You used biased, cherrypicked observations (you only remember non-looksmatched pairings because they stand out to you) to try and tell me my thoroughly observed data was wrong. No wonder I’m gonna try and defend myself. In a normal conversation hopefully you wouldn’t act like that immediately out of the gate

0

Anonymous #2 7w

You mean your anecdotal evidence. You just claiming things don’t make those things true. In a normal conversation maybe you would engage honestly and understand what people are saying when they say it. And then maybe after they said it, you could take the time; the 3 seconds it would take, to not cry about being “prejudged”

0

Anonymous OP 7w

Like I said in my follow up to my original reply, social desirability bias makes me skeptical of self reported data like this. There is a measured increase in social desirability bias on women than on men.

0

Anonymous #3 7w

Are you a woman?

0

Anonymous #2 7w

Would that make any of my points more or less valid if I was?

0

Anonymous #3 7w

Yes, it would go some way to explain your defensiveness to my original comment to where you would downvote my original comment merely for expressing a pretty reasonable opinion.

0

Anonymous #2 7w

If I was a woman it would explain how someone would react to a generalized and untrue statement?

0

Anonymous #3 7w

My original comment doesn’t have any untrue statements at all. I pointed out my experience and said “looks clearly do matter and dating is not purely meritocratic” and for some reason that made you VERY defensive so I’m thinking you may feel unconsciously that I called you shallow, in spite of you not even commenting before me.

-1

Anonymous #2 7w

That’s not an answer. I didn’t ask what you think in terms of my reaction. I asked if being a woman would explain a reaction to an untrue and a generalized statement. Yes or no?

1

Anonymous #3 7w

I didn’t make an untrue or generalised statement. That’s not a hypothetical we have to talk about because that’s not what happened. The fact is that you are being defensive because you don’t practice what you preach. Given what you said about “chopped guys with absolute baddies” I think my hypothesis is correct. You never said “I have dated some chopped guys because they were good people”

0

Anonymous #2 7w

Untrue and generalized statement btw.

1

Anonymous #2 7w

You’re not answering. YOU brought up if I was a man or woman and how that would “explain” my reaction. Why does being a womans reaction matter to what is a generalized statement that is also untrue factually?

1

Anonymous #3 7w

Your only evidence of that is self-report data but we could make two tinder accounts right now and have one hot guy who lists himself as conservative and one average guy who lists himself as liberal and the hot guy would get more matches every single time. This experiment has been done before. Women saying they’d choose the average guy is social desirability bias.

0

Anonymous #2 7w

You mean anecdotal evidence, is what I’m referring to. The thing you implied wasn’t true when I told you what I told you. How about this, prove most women, that includes all of them, everywhere, would prefer a trump supporting guy, over a less attractive liberal guy. Show the proof.

1

Anonymous #3 7w

Every experiment ever done on the subject has proven that physical attractiveness is the most important factor in dating, far more than politics, but if you wanna pay me to create two fake tinder profiles and test it both here and when I go back to school, go for it. I’m not doing that for free considering I’m already working on a different experiment for my honors thesis.

0

Anonymous #2 7w

incel detected

1

Anonymous #2 7w

You didn’t do it. Try again. Show the proof.

0

Anonymous #3 7w

https://www.reddit.com/r/BlackPillScience/comments/1hyy9fa/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

0

Anonymous #3 7w

Before you ask I’m not on Reddit period nor am I on that subreddit, I asked ChatGPT if someone had conducted a study similar to the one I proposed but no one had done one before

0

Anonymous #2 7w

this isn’t showing proof then. You said “most” women would prefer X. You’ve yet to substantiate it. Stop giving me useless anecdotal evidence and substantiate your claim. I’m waiting

1

Anonymous #3 7w

Dude I just showed you, read the fucking study

0

Anonymous #2 7w

And this study, to be clear, it confirms that “most” women out of “all” women or a majority of women on this planet, were the ones being studied? Since most implies that out of the total number a majority felt this way?

0

Anonymous #3 7w

This isn’t even about their feelings, this is about their actions.

0

Anonymous #2 7w

That didn’t answer. It was done on all or not? Try again.

1

Anonymous #3 7w

Dude if you’re trying to say that sample data is invalid just by virtue of being a sample you are being deliberately obtuse. They had a sample WELL over 30, which is enough for the central limit theorem to kick in.

0

Anonymous #2 7w

Do you think it’s reasonable to assume “most” (in terms of behavior) of an entire identity based off less than 1K interviews/studies?

0

Anonymous #3 7w

Yes, it’s 445 individuals which is, again, more than ten times higher than the central limit theorem

0

Anonymous #2 7w

What you just said yes to is directly pulled from a racial stereotype argument

0

Anonymous #2 7w

womp womp

3