Yik Yak logo
Download TikTok Instagram X
Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
US Politics icon
user profile icon
US Politics 2w

big_al_the_riddler

 Conservatives genuinely do not understand what gender affirming care is lmao
13 upvotes, 22 comments. Yik Yak image post by big_al_the_riddler in US Politics. "Conservatives genuinely do not understand what gender affirming care is lmao"
US Politics icon
US Politics 2w
Viagra is gender affirming care btw
comment

22
upvote 13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

I’m a cis woman who takes hormone anti androgen meds that are actually commonly used by trans women bc my hormones are messed up and I produce too many androgens like testosterone for a woman. Like should I not be allowed to take that bc it balances my body and has feminine effects and gets rid the masculine things and acne and excess hair and stuff I don’t want

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

It was in response to this definition

post
upvote -1 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

If you really wanna take that to the most disingenuous m level of analysis possible by throwing violent crime into the same boat as medication then you’re either extremely stupid or blindly ignorant

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> big_al_the_riddler 2w

Thats the point of the comment. A definition that groups those things together is moronic.

upvote -1 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

I think it’s a given that “gender affirming care” would not include actions such as violent crime. That goes directly counter to the idea of both providing or receiving care. Again, you’re either extremely stupid or blindly ignorant if that’s the kind of granular and disingenuous logic you wanna run with

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> big_al_the_riddler 2w

Yes, we all agree on that point. That is literally the entire point of the comment.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

#2 here care is not in that definition so uh yeah put on your thinking cap

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

What I defined is gender affirmations

upvote 5 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

No, that’s not the point of the comment. I’m saying that #2 would not be including things such as violent crime even within that “broad definition” because it’s a given that those sorts of actions wouldn’t fit under the idea of “care.” You are saying they would in your argument. That is what is either extremely stupid or blindly ignorant. Again, you’re being disingenuous.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

You literally responded to a comment asking “what is gender affirming care?”

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

Beep boop bop, I didn’t say nothing about care

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> big_al_the_riddler 2w

Yes, obviously everyone is aware that violent crime is not care. The entire point is to show how flawed the definition is.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

Your comment was literally a response to this:

post
upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

It’s the internet not a damn essay

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

But let’s take you at your word. Do you think everyone has a right to gender affirmations? If not, how is it relevant to the discussion?

upvote 0 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

The definition is not flawed. Your understanding of violent abuse being a given non-example is flawed, however. My point is that you’re being so granular and so disingenuous with your point that it’s ridiculous.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

I don’t think many people take issue with adults taking evidence based treatments.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> big_al_the_riddler 2w

Sure bud

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

We were talking about gender affirming care. Gender affirmations is another thing

upvote 2 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

Is that really all you’ve got to say about it lmao? If you’re gonna try and make a genuine point in a discussion like this, maybe don’t jump to obviously ridiculous extremes like that?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

I was just referring to the screenshot in the post

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

What is the evidence based treatment to gender dysphoria

upvote 5 downvote