Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
you fucking idiots can’t comprehend hypotheticals. “but kirk isn’t hitler” yea obviously dumbass, that’s not what the statement is about
y'all would probably be like "hitler had a family 😢😢😢" if he died today
upvote 251 downvote

user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

Not being able to understand hypotheticals is a sign of lower intelligence.

upvote 15 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

Yep comparing a man who killed millions to a man that used his freedom of speech to preach his opinions. You need a therapist

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

While*

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

Y’all are dumb. Kirk wasn’t anywhere near a Nazi and it’s so idiotic to even say that because Hitler oppressed mainly Jews whereas Charlie obviously didn’t. We get the associating, y’all just like to pretend we’re not getting it in order to have a superiority complex

upvote -2 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 1w

Kirk quite literally used Nazi talking points when talking about black and brown ppl lmao💀

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> thereal._.ruckus 1w

Like?

upvote -1 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 1w

“The civil rights movement was a mistake”

upvote 11 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 1w

But it’s not like ur gonna actually care cause yk he said some crazily racist shit but yall don’t care

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 1w

no, you just showed that obviously don’t get it. it’s NOT associating him with hitler, it’s not saying he’s like hitler, it’s not saying he’s comparable to hitler. it’s saying an argument is bad because it can’t be applied holistically

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 1w

reference my reply to #2

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> thereal._.ruckus 1w

Dude you’re reaching and misquoting what he actually said. He actually didn’t say that AT ALL and it was another commentator who made people think that: https://youtu.be/K9T2uRVv9xQ?si=4_gwqnzvvFXqDZ8E. He said that the civil rights movement was well intentioned at first, but it’s metamorphasized into a beast which holds more hatred

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

It really seems like you’re jumbling up the actual argument to fit your own narrative in order to make conservatives “look dumb”. Why even mention Hitler if you’re not referring to Nazis? They’re clearly saying that we’re sympathizing with someone who 100 years in the future will be looked at as someone as terrible as Hitler which isn’t true and it’s stupid to steer the argument away from the actual meaning of the post

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 1w

we’re saying arguments like “it’s bad to wish harm on him, he had a family!” is a stupid argument because it can’t be applied holistically. the quoted post is making fun of y’all’s inability to understand that you can argue it’s bad to wish harm on him, but come up with a better argument than “he had a family” or “think about his kids.” come up with an argument that can be applied to every situation, even hitler.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Yeah you are reaching. It is bad to wish death on anybody. Period. That argument can be used for anyone, even Hitler. Like what is there to disagree about? It is devastating to families when a person dies, even if they’re “bad” by your standards. Again, you’re making the correlation of Charlie being like Hitler. That’s what you’re inferring in your argument otherwise Hitler wouldn’t have even been mentioned. Charlie isn’t near as wild as Hitler was so if you want to make this argument maybe

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

just don’t use Hitler as an example. It’s a pretty old and overused argument, anyway

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Harm isn’t even what we’re arguing here, it’s death. I’d wish harm upon Hitler but not death. And the thing is Charlie wasn’t committing mass genocide. I mean I could wish harm upon Hitler and say he deserves to be put in a gas chamber to face the consequences of his actions, but why did Charlie deserve death of all things? If you really wanted him to suffer, you’d get him arrested so he could live a miserable life in jail but there’s nothing to arrest him for. Death is punishment to the family

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 1w

what about making an argument applicable to every situation do you not understand? nobody, and i do mean nobody, believes it’s bad to wish harm on someone in *EVERY* case. you’re not buddha. there is *some* situation where you would wish harm on someone. maybe it’s if they were robbing you. maybe it’s if they are trying to kill your child. figure out what your moral boundaries are and justify them with an argument that can apply to ALL situations

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Yeah again this isn’t an argument about harm, it’s death

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Stop trying to minimize the situation

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Like if a person was trying to rob you, of course you should grab a gun and shoot them in the leg. Shooting them in the head and killing them on purpose is unethical

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 1w

i wish more harm on kirk than death. i wish he had been worked to the bone in a labor camp for the rest of his miserable life. im not minimizing shit

upvote 1 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 1w

There’s a fucking video of him saying lmfao

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> thereal._.ruckus 1w

Again he’s TALKING about his own personal opinions. Whole hitler didn’t use words he used his power and killed people. No comparison

upvote 0 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 1w

Never compared him to Hitler…he’s still a racist tho lmao

upvote 0 downvote