Anonymous #1 6d

Im talking about actual real life, where the right wing commits between 70 and 90 percent of all deadly domestic terror every single year. Why are you part of a terrorist organization?

-3

Anonymous #2 6d

I wish these texts were leaked before the AG Democratic primaries in June so I could’ve voted accordingly (I didn’t vote). I wonder why they were not

2

Anonymous #2 6d

Word. So I react the same way lol. fedposting bad, but republicans statistically speaking commit the majority of deadly domestic terror. So I figure they’re probably a more important focus

1

Anonymous #2 6d

Idk

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

The texts were bad, I just doubt the GOP actually takes them seriously since they sat on them for so long (including during a primary, when voters could’ve nominated someone else for AG)

1

Anonymous #2 6d

No it’s just some lunatic fedposting. Nobody as far as I’m aware is under the impression the dem candidate has any interest in hurting anyone lmao

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

Lol the commercials im seeing here in VA would say otherwise

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

Name some actual examples excluding January 6th even though that one is debatable too. I can name many examples of left wing violence off the top of my head without even having to look it up.

1

Anonymous #4 6d

“Name examples excluding the massive terrorist attack where they assaulted cops and smeared shit on the walls of the capital” There are literally hundreds, but isn’t it kinda wild you have to say that out the gate? How recently do you want a case of a conservative terror attack

-1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

I’m sure you have no problem with BLM assaulting cops and burning down private businesses, or California protestors throwing boulders at police a few months ago, everyone on the right agrees J6 was awful, but you can’t even hold yourselves to your own standard

4

Anonymous #5 6d

“Everyone on the right agrees Jan six is awful” Not your president, who freed cop killers and pedophiles and called it a day of “peace and freedom”

0

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

Both of those things that you state are false. Not to mention the capital police allowed the people to come in. Some were even showing some protesters around. There is also video of some protesters praying in one of the areas where congress meets. Should they have been in there, no, but January 6th was far less violent than the left makes it out to be. But they have to because that is really all they have when citing right wing violence.

2

Anonymous #4 6d

Oh yeah for sure. The capital police let them smear shit all over the walls too. You know it’s not suddenly legal and not a terror attack just because some cops were in on it. That makes sense. Conservative cops love shit like that.

0

Anonymous #4 6d

You’re just a pathetic terrorist, defending such an awful attack. You’re anti American.

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

Do you support the BLM riots?

1

Anonymous #5 6d

You’re actively defending a terror attack.

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

I already said J6 was awful so you just chose to ignore that, but you won’t answer my question do you support the BLM riots?

2

Anonymous #5 6d

Like, there’s no turning this table. Youre a terrorist. You support the release of terrorists. And not to mention the people Trump released went on to continue to commit awful and evil crimes. And you support that.

0

Anonymous #5 6d

YOU said it was awful, but the person you voted for did not, and in fact directly incited it. So forgive me if I think you’re a lying terrorist. Thisd be like saying 9/11 was bad and then voting for bin Laden for president.

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

So as I said twice already I completely condemn J6 and it was a horrible day in US history, do you support the BLM riots?

1

Anonymous #5 6d

And yet you support a president who does not.

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

I did not vote for anyone

1

Anonymous #5 6d

Weird. Almost like you’re a liar, and a terrorist.

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

It’s funny to me that you won’t answer my question so I’ll assume you believe assaulting cops and burning peoples businesses to the ground is acceptable when democrats do it, whereas I believe terror attacks on every aisle are evil, who’s the real terrorist here?

1

Anonymous #5 6d

It’s funny to me you keep ignoring the fact you support Jan sixth. You can pretend to condemn it, but if you actually did, you wouldn’t be a Trump supporter. If you can face that reality, we can continue the conversation. If not, oh well. I don’t negotiate with terrorists.

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

You see this is what people on the left do. You don’t have an actual argument so you deflect by calling us “terrorists” or “nazis”.

0

Anonymous #4 6d

No I have an argument. It goes like this. “Regardless of whether or not you SAY you condemn January sixth, you still continue to support a leader who both supports and incited that attack. This is like if you said you condemned 9/11 but then voted for bin Laden” So far neither of you have been able to even interact with this statement. Because if you did, you’d have to admit you’re pro jan sixth.

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

I never said I was a Trump supporter, you just assumed that, I did not vote for him and I dislike a lot of things he has done but i condemn all terro attacks and you only condemn terror attacks on the right but support terror attacks from the left, and you voted for a candidate who incited and funded many of those 2020 riots, you are just a nasty person and a hypocrite

3

Anonymous #5 6d

“I don’t support Trump I just parrot all his talking points and never meaningfully disagree with him.” Aw that’s cute you think you’re a special terrorist.

0

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

So far in this conversation my only two talking points have been January 6th was awful (how is that a Trump talking point?) and the BLM riots were also reprehensible. You are genuinely a stupid and terrible person

1

Anonymous #5 6d

Your goal is to compare a series of mostly peaceful protests with a direct terrorist attack on our capital. That is a Trump talking point.

0

Anonymous #5 6d

By doing that you both launder the events of Jan sixth, by comparing them to a peaceful protests, and make BLM look more dangerous by comparing it to a terror attack. It’s not subtle and you ain’t slick

0

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

Um, are you stupid? How can you deny the BLM riots ever happened? BLM resulted in destroying billions of dollars in property damage, as well as an actual assault on police (actual videos of police being set on fire by BLM “protestors”, the BLM riots and J6 are both terrible terrible events in American history and should both be condemned, and somehow that makes me a terrorist, you need to take a good look in the mirror

4

Anonymous #5 6d

Yea man I heard Portland was burned to the ground. Took a visit the other day and it was just a pile of smoldering ash. If only blm hadn’t burned down all our cities :<

0

Anonymous #5 6d

Portland is just a band of roving gangs, it’s called the “Chaz republic” now actually. Its joever the west has fallen. Stop watching Fox News and go outside virgin.

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

I guess that means J6 never happened either because I just saw a pic of the capitol and it looked perfectly fine! See how dumb that logic is? You are a hypocrite who supports left wing terror, I am a person who condemns all forms of terror attacks, you are not a moral person

1

Anonymous #5 6d

Yeah except they actually broke into the capital and smeared shit on the walls, and believe it or not, no cities were burned down in the events of BLM.

1

Anonymous #5 6d

So that sorta pokes a hole in that.

1

Anonymous #5 6d

“I’m a person who condemns all terror attacks, I just refuse to acknowledge the statistical fact that the right wing commits the vast majority of them.” Then you don’t condemn them all. You’re just playing defense by acting as though this is a both sides issue, but it ain’t.

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

What is the statistic?

1

Anonymous #5 6d

I didn’t realize that was the whole city. Fun fact did you know the majority of arsonists caught during BLM were right wing agitators? Why’d you burn down Portland to?

-1

Anonymous #5 6d

*yo?

0

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

Evidence? And you condone that that man’s business was destroyed. As well as the countless others, you can’t condemn left wing violence which shows you are chill with political violence, I guess when you were calling me a terrorist you were just projecting

9

Anonymous #5 6d

Antioch, Nashville/madison, Florida state, and Minneapolis are all mass shootings perpetrated by neo Nazis during this calendar year.

0

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

Bro can’t stop deflecting

1

Anonymous #5 6d

Sure yeah. Federal prosecutors charged multiple people during the 2020 riots with incitement of violence showed intention to commit arson in court, these people were a part of the far right boogaloo movement.

1

Anonymous #3 6d

I literally just named like five

1

Anonymous #5 6d

Between the years of 2001 and 2017, 71 percent of all deadly domestic terror attacks were perpetrated by the right wing. The rest by radical islamists, so the right wing again. None by the left wing. Zero. Zilch. This is sourced from the US govt accountability office.

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

And the Charlie Kirk assassination, annunciation shooting, California riots, and Dallas ICE attack were all left wing, you said that the right is STATISTICALLY more likely to cause political violence, so please give me the statistic unless you just made that up

2

Anonymous #5 6d

So far I see one comparable example and it’s Kirk’s shooting. The rest are either obviously not actually left wing, like the Dallas “ice” attacks, which if you actually look at the death toll only killed and injured ice detainees. And the other is just a riot. Which yk. Isn’t a terror attack.

0

Anonymous #5 6d

I did. Between the years 2001 and 2017 the right wing committed 71 percent of all deadly domestic terror and the left committed zero percent according to the US government accountability office

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

So a few people being charged (not even gonna fact check) means the MAJORITY of the BLM violence was from the right? You are just ridiculous

2

Anonymous #6 6d

Very true. Every time I meet the goal set by number five they just ask a new question and set a new goal. But that’s fine.

0

Anonymous #5 6d

Yea lmao I’m sure you’re not gonna check. Why would you, truth doesn’t actually matter to you lmao.

0

Anonymous #6 6d

Hey man it’s not my fault the right wing commits the majority of deadly terror attacks every single year for the last several decades

0

Anonymous #5 6d

71 percent.

0

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

Are you going to ignore all the transgender school and church shootings? Speaking of Nashville, there was a shooting last year done by a left wing transgender student, as someone who lives in Nashville, more shooters are left wing sorry to say

0

Anonymous #6 6d

Right that was the one I was referring to. That transgender student wrote “Jew gas” and a bunch of other Nazi shit on their gun. They were a right wing trans person. Lmao.

1

Anonymous #6 6d

Nice deflection tho.

1

Anonymous #6 6d

Also a huge portion of church shootings are done by the right wing. Like almost all of them. It’s usually some neonazi who thinks the Jews are using religion to control people or something.

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

You don’t know what a terroist attack is then, the ICE shooter had ANTI-ICE slogans carved into his bullets, and a riot can absolutely be a terrorist stack because terrorism is literally just unlawful violent acts in pursuit of political aims, which the California riots were.

6

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

Do you do your own research or just get statistics from Google? If you’ve ever taken a single statistical analysis class you’ll know that the accurate observation one can is that most statistics are biased and anyone can make a statistic to support their point.

3

Anonymous #5 6d

Not carved. Drawn on with blue sharpie. And again, the guy “going after ice” only shot detainees. And he used a sniper. So it wasn’t an accident lmao.

0

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

No im not checking because whether or not those examples are accurate it doesn’t change the argument

1

Anonymous #6 6d

I get my stats from the us government accountability office.

1

Anonymous #6 6d

Deflecting what exactly?

1

Anonymous #5 6d

Right because your argument has nothing to do with truth.

1

Anonymous #5 6d

Which is my point. This is all just vibes.

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

And again you’re deflecting? Do you not condemn this dem leader for his words? He made it clear in the texts he wasn’t joking and history has proven that the left celebrates the death of its political opponents

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

Link please, I’d like to see it. I’ve looked into this extensively and I’ve never been able to find a .gov that supports these claims

1

Anonymous #6 6d

I’ll condemn it when you say “Trump is directly responsible for the January sixth terror attack.” Say that and I’ll condemn it lol.

0

Anonymous #6 6d

Later I have class rn.

0

I didn’t ever ask a question. The only question I’ve asked was for the stats link, but that was after

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

So you have time to fight with people online but you don’t have time to pull up a link? Not making a good case here for yourself

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

It shouldn’t take me condemning an unrelated topic for you to condemn this. You continue to deflect with every response. And for what it’s worth, trump was directly responsible for Jan 6th but I can’t call it a terror attack.

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

I can’t seem to find this statistic from them, did you just make it up? I would love to see what you’re seeing

1

Anonymous #6 6d

That’s what I thought terrorist.

-1

Anonymous #6 6d

Yeah that’s true I actually don’t have time this very second. It’s not hard to find, but if you want the link from me you’ll have to wait cuz I’m in class now

-1

Anonymous #6 6d

It started three minutes ago. So yk. Bye

-1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

No, but regardless of whether or not those 3 examples you gave are accurate, I can do the same with leftist terror attacks as I did that you attempted poorly to debunk

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

Keyboard warrior over here, doesn’t know anything about me yet now I’m a terrorist. You gotta grow up

5

Anonymous #6 6d

Ya im almost convinced this dumbass is rage baiting at this point but with the crazy amount of far leftists on this app they might be serious, not even worth engaging with at this point honestly

-1

Anonymous #5 6d

Idk man, take a look at their post history, they are on here all day posting and replying. Thats some dedication to rage bait

0

Anonymous #3 6d

That’s how the entirety of politics to someone like mushy. It’s nice to see people starting to rise against it

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

Can you provide actual evidence instead of quoting your own posts and just saying “they were definitely right wing”. Jew gas isn’t proof of anything, last I checked, the left was just as against Israel as the right. I think you’ll be surprised how much propaganda you’ll find about these shootings once you look under the hood and look at source material. Remember how they tried to say Kirk’s shooter was MAGA? That goes against literally all the source material

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

Ya you gotta be a troll because I don’t think it’s possible for someone to be this stupid, you start bashing me for “not caring about the truth” when every statement you make is a babbling lie

1

Anonymous #6 6d

“Just because they wrote ‘I love Hitler’ on their gun does not mean they’re right wing” Dude. Pathetic.

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

Yikes, got me good 😱

1

Anonymous #6 6d

My guy you asked if they got their information from Google and they responded with no. I implore you to look up what deflecting means

1

Anonymous #7 6d

The two replies were meant to be back to back, they responded before I could finish the second reply

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

Still waiting on that link twin

1

Anonymous #6 6d

https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-17-300.pdf?

1

Anonymous #6 6d

Page 28. It’s actually from 2001-2016, and the stat is 73 percent not 71.

1

Anonymous #6 6d

If you want to save the trouble, assuming compression doesn’t make this illegible

1

Anonymous #6 6d

If you attempt to copy the link by screenshotting it, and then highlighting the text, it will often copy with a space where the new like starts. So, yk, be aware of that when copying the link.

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

Well for one, maybe it’s just too hard to read but I see nothing in there about you’re 71% statistic and it’s convenient how it stops at 2016 when democrats and moderate republicans held office throughout that entire period

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

So… using 10 year old data is acceptable when debating? Are you ever gonna stop taking L’s? I can’t even argue with data like this. This is why I couldn’t find any concurrency with my research data, I was using up-to-date material.

1

Anonymous #5 6d

My bad. That’s where the catalogue of each individual attack starts. Page four.

1

Anonymous #6 6d

Yeah I think using ten year old data is fine. It’s not like the trend has meaningfully changed. The majority of deadly extremist violence in the last 10 years have also been right wing.

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

Ummmm yes it has? Obviously if you look at a timeframe when democrats held office throughout there’s going to be less left wing violence, but you don’t think there’s been meaningful change to that statistic since Trumps been in office? You’re either just lying or are genuinely clueless

2

Anonymous #5 6d

Hold on I’ll find data on 2025.

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

This paper also doesn’t even track left wing violence period, it’s only data for far right and Islamic terror attacks. Will you still use this data in the future to try and prove your claims?

1

Anonymous #6 6d

That’s literally not true.

1

Anonymous #6 6d

Lmao.

1

Anonymous #5 6d

2025 is too new, the year isn’t over so nobody has catalogued this yet. but since you want data for a Republican presidency, how about trumps first term?

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

From what I skimmed through, I didn’t see anything relating to left wing violence. Where can I find it?

1

Anonymous #6 6d

You’d have to go to a year when it happened.

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

How about any data from 2016-present…

1

Anonymous #6 6d

Okay, but we might have to go year by year. I’m not sure if there’s data that’s been pooled together for that.

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

But is it in the paper you sent me? The only data in that paper is data for far right extremists and Islamic extremists. You tried to say republicans commit 72% of the terror attacks compared to democrats (or at least that what you insinuated) when that’s simply not true. They committed 72% compared to Islamic extremists. Even that is a deceptive data group bc America cracked down on Muslim immigration after 9/11 so there was a disproportionate amount of right-wing extremists to Islamic groups.

1

Anonymous #6 6d

I have data for 2018 from the ADL saying all extremist murders were committed by the right wing. CSIS datasets flagged white supremacists as being the largest lethal threat in 2019-2020 The ADL reported again in 2022-2024 that all violent extremist murders were perpetrated by the right wing.

1

Anonymous #6 6d

Right they’re the only ones that committed deadly acts of violence in that span from 2001-2016. They say that in the paper, read it dude.

1

Anonymous #6 6d

It’s not that there’s deadly left wing violence being hidden from you, it just didn’t happen in that span.

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

I’m really asking for anything bro. Also look for overall political violence, just inquiring about terror attacks is dishonest since the analysts can be selective with what they consider a “terror attack”

1

Anonymous #6 6d

Anything of what?

1

Anonymous #6 6d

“Bro actually the analysts are biased and actually none of this data can be trusted” Whatever. I’m not gonna drown the horse trying to make it drink some fuckin water.

1

Anonymous #6 6d

Yerp.

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

You wrote those replies before I could finish typing that out, mb.

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

The ADL was just removed from the FBI for being unreliable and untrustworthy (look it up). I was looking at the same article you were (I think) and did you see the definitions they used for “right wing terrorist attacks”? I’ll paste in the chat so you all can read. Last I checked 1. threat of political violence isn’t a terror attack and 2. They use disproportionately weighted topics to create their data sets. They’re was no mention of racial violence from the left wing in this definition 🤔

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

First, right-wing terrorism refers to the use or threat of violence by sub-national or non-state entities whose goals may include racial or ethnic supremacy; opposition to government authority; anger at women, including from the incel ("involuntary celibate") movement; and outrage against certain policies, such as abortion. This analysis uses the term "right-wing terrorism" rather than "racially- and ethnically-motivated violent extremism," or REMVE, which is used by some in the U.S. government?

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

Second, left-wing terrorism involves the use or threat of violence by sub-national or non-state entities that oppose capitalism, imperialism, and colonialism; pursue environmental or animal rights issues; espouse pro-communist or pro-socialist beliefs; or support a decentralized social and political system such as anarchism.

1

Anonymous #6 6d

Whole lotta cope. Lots of words to say left wing extremism kills less people. I gotta go to bed dude.

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 6d

Take a statistics class bro, data is easy to bias. Sorry but that’s the truth. Thanks for the debate, it’s rare to find well spoken people and you definitely showed me some interesting stuff. I hope I made you ask a few questions as well. Cya

1