Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
The senate was also DESIGNED with slave states in mind. We don’t have slave states anymore, therefore it has outlived its purpose to give slave states equal representation.
Yes, the Senate is undemocratic The founding fathers DESIGNED IT that way. You couldn’t even directly elect your senator until 1913. It’s democracy of the United STATES not United people
upvote 14 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 15h

Fuck democracy overall

upvote -1 downvote
🐘
Anonymous 17h

“The cotton gin was invented with slave states in mind, we don’t have leave states anymore, so the cotton gin has outlived its purpose.” Lmao what is this logic.

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> last_republican_on_yikyak 17h

The cotton gin is a tool, not a governing institution that gives some people disproportionate political power. The question isn't whether something was created in a society with slavery it's whether the thing's original purpose and structure justify keeping it today. The cotton gin doesn't give some Americans more political representation than others. The Senate does. Moron

upvote 6 downvote
🐘
Anonymous replying to -> OP 17h

Its purpose is to directly give minorities disproportionate power to help the country stay more united.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> last_republican_on_yikyak 17h

Not racial minorities. It’s purpose was to keep them enslaved

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> last_republican_on_yikyak 17h

That’s a justification, not proof that the Senate is necessary. You’re assuming that giving a minority of the population disproportionate political power creates unity, but it can just as easily create resentment when legislation supported by a majority of Americans is repeatedly blocked. Why should we automatically prioritize protecting a minority from being outvoted over ensuring that every American has an equal say in their government?

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> last_republican_on_yikyak 17h

Imagine arguing that a minority group should get disproportionate political power simply because they’re a minority. You’d probably object to that principle in other contexts, so why is it automatically justified when the minority in question happens to live in less-populated states? Protecting minority rights is important. But protecting people's rights is not the same thing as guaranteeing some citizens more voting power than others. Actually demonstrate why the senate is necessary

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 17h

I have a feeling he wouldn’t be a fan of those European and Asian parliaments that have reserved seats for ethnic minorities

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 17h

Oh god no he piss his diaper and cry

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 15h

Then leave the country if you don’t like it :)) go to North Korea

upvote 1 downvote
🐘
Anonymous replying to -> #3 15h

Democracy is awesome dude. That’s how we elected Trump.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 12h

then move to an authoritarian state. heard Iran is great this time of year

upvote 1 downvote