Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download

___joker__

Prioritizing Americans and America means helping other nations. Growing up is realizing that carte blanche isolationism is a cancerous ideology that has zero benefits. You have no allies, you lose your buying power, and the poor stay poor.
Why is saying that we should prioritize America and Americans over other nations a bad thing?
upvote 9 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 2d

No one said isolationism, simply putting the interests of our country over the issues that other nations face. We can scale down our commitments overseas while maintaining allies.

upvote 4 downvote
🃏
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2d

No, we can’t. Scaling down commitments means losing acquisition to resources and political presence. Destroying programs like USAID means millions of people a year DEAD. Money and resources that are minuscule for us but a lifeline to others. I fundamentally reject any worldview that doesn’t have the United States doing the best it can to project its values.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> ___joker__ 2d

Our values! We can’t even help our own people what the fuck are we supposed to help others with? Their economies? Their immigration issues? Their wars? We are TRILLIONS in debt and half the time other nations bitch about us being involved in their business. We need to focus on ourselves.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2d

I feel like you aren’t realizing that stuff like USAID appreciably helps Americans too. Less refugees to deal with, less infectious diseases to jump here, more skilled immigrants to help our economy, more international allies, less terrorism.

upvote 11 downvote
🃏
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2d

You’re assuming that helping other countries is what’s preventing us from helping Americans, but that’s not really how it works. Most foreign aid is a tiny fraction of the budget, and a lot of it comes back to us through trade, stability, and alliances. You can argue about priorities, but it’s not a zero-sum tradeoff like you’re framing it.

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> ___joker__ 2d

Yeah and generally the people trying to defund international aid are also defunding all the helpful domestic programs

upvote 6 downvote
🃏
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2d

Exactly! Like oh…you want to cut off all funding to Israel and instead give that money to help single mothers, the poor, and elderly? No?!? Shocker!

upvote 4 downvote
🃏
Anonymous replying to -> ___joker__ 2d

And that’s not to defend Israel by any means, it’s just calling out the bullshit for what it is.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2d

We’re in trillions of dollars of debt but y’all think cutting less than $60B will make a sizable dent 💀 let’s start with the defense budget and the fact Medicare couldn’t negotiate until 2-3 years ago

upvote 1 downvote