Anonymous #1 17h

except you’re not though, because you don’t even genuinely discuss the actual research. all you try to do is discredit any and all studies that have conclusions in favor of inclusivity of trans people; without ever citing any studies or articles that support your own bullshit claim. you’re not slick.

1

Anonymous #2 17h

lmao we’ve looped through this conversation like 100 times so feel free to read back through, my responses will be the same since you cant actually respond to them. also feel free to respond to my actual critiques of the study i posted! since thats what my claim is about

-1

Anonymous #1 17h

as I’ve repeatedly told you, I’m not entertaining your malice. when you’re actually willing to try and support your own claims, rather than build a subjective layer stop them in order to discredit other studies while avoiding the citation of studies in favor of your underlying claim, then we can talk.

1

Anonymous #2 17h

it’s quite telling as to why you feel the need to expand from the underlying claim of “trans women have an advantage over cis women in sports” (which was your claim yesterday in the other post, I was there), especially considering you were barely able to cite any studies and OP displayed the flaws in them on the spot; to this new stance of “any studies denying the advantages trans women have over cis women are not quality studies”

1

Anonymous #2 17h

you were not capable of defending yourself, so you had to create an entire new goalpost in which you attempt to inherently discredit all articles that disagree with you. It’s strange and malicious, but you never intended of having a genuine conversation, did you? hence why I am STILL waiting for you to cite a single study in favor of your foundational claim, which was my original request as well; the request in which you responded with the article in question.

1

Anonymous #2 17h

either you’re maliciously transphobic, or genuinely illiterate. I’ll leave that choice up to you.

1

Anonymous #2 16h

yeah so once again feel free to read back through and loop the convo! i gave you responses for everything you just havent responded to them

0

Anonymous #1 16h

you can’t project your flaws, especially that severely, when you’re committing them right now lol We get it, youre addicted to the “debate” bullshit, but you’re also terrible at it. quite a dilemma.

1

Anonymous #2 16h

i dont get the meta conversation. either respond to the points or stfu

0

Anonymous #2 16h

also every one of your responses is the most debate bro pilled shit ive ever seen lmao, that comment is severe projection

0

Anonymous #1 16h

take your own advice then, or fuck off. this conversation will stay exactly right here until you have the decency and bravery to attempt to actually defend your own arguments and claims. you can’t sit there and repeatedly move the goalposts every time you receive criticism or are discredited, then try and criticize the people you’re conversing with

1

Anonymous #1 16h

like I said, I was the one who asked you to cite a study in the first place, and I specifically asked you to defend your foundational claim, not your subjective and topical one. Either cite a new study directly in defense of your foundational claim, or fuck off.

1

Anonymous #2 16h

a study that shows what exactly? im getting lost in the dramatics

1